Skip to content

Phones · head to head

15 Ultra vs 17

Save New comparison

Xiaomi

15 Ultra

No price yet
3 spec wins
Higher score

Xiaomi

17

₹89,999
5 spec wins

Quick verdict

  • 15 Ultra is better for camera.
  • 15 Ultra is better for gaming and speed.
  • 17 is better for battery life.
  • 17 is better for light and compact.
  • 15 Ultra leads on display.
  • 17 has the higher Comparezi Score (56.7).

Computed from stored specifications, the published phones scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.

Winners by area

Display 15 Ultra
Performance 15 Ultra
Camera Tie
Battery 17
Build 17

Specifications side by side

Spec
15 Ultra
17
Display
Display size
6.73" (better)
6.3"
Display type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
3200 x 1440
2656 x 1220
Refresh rate
120 Hz
120 Hz
Peak brightness
3,200 nits
3,500 nits (better)
Brightness measured as
Multi-scenario peak
—
Performance
Processor
Snapdragon 8 Elite Mobile Platform
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Mobile Platform
Chipset process
3 nm
3 nm
RAM
16 GB (better)
12 GB
Storage
512 GB
512 GB
Memory options
16 GB + 512 GB
12 GB + 512 GB
Camera
Main camera
50 MP
50 MP
Ultra-wide camera
50 MP
50 MP
Telephoto camera
200 MP (better)
50 MP
Front camera
32 MP
50 MP (better)
Battery
Battery
5,410 mAh
6,330 mAh (better)
Charging speed
90 W
100 W (better)
Wireless charging
Yes
Yes
Software
Operating system
Android
Android
Software
Xiaomi HyperOS 2
Xiaomi HyperOS 3
Build
Weight
229 g
191 g (better)
5G
Yes
Yes
Water resistance
IP68
IP68 + IP69
SIM
Dual SIM (nano SIM + nano SIM or nano SIM + eSIM)
Dual SIM, eSIM support
Colours
Silver Chrome
Ice Blue, Venture Green, Black

A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.

Price and availability

Store links are not paid: prices are copied from each store's own page with the date checked, and Comparezi earns only from labelled ads. How we earn

15 Ultra

No price yet

17

₹89,999

Pros and cons

15 Ultra

  • Pro: 90 W wired charging, faster than 84 % of the 338 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
  • Pro: Dedicated 200 MP telephoto camera
  • Pro: Wireless charging
  • Pro: IP68 dust and water resistance
  • Con: Heavier than most phones on Comparezi (229 g)
  • Con: No published update policy

17

  • Pro: 100 W wired charging, faster than 94 % of the 338 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
  • Pro: Dedicated 50 MP telephoto camera
  • Pro: Wireless charging
  • Pro: IP68 + IP69 dust and water resistance
  • Con: No published update policy

Which should you buy?

17 if you want the strongest overall specification: it has the higher Comparezi Score (56.7).

More

Other phones comparisons

View all →
Compare