vivo
Phones · head to head
X300 vs 17 Ultra
Xiaomi
17 Ultra
Quick verdict
- X300 is better for camera.
- 17 Ultra is better for gaming and speed.
- X300 is better for light and compact.
- 17 Ultra leads on display.
- 17 Ultra leads on performance.
- X300 has the higher Comparezi Score (62.1).
Computed from stored specifications, the published phones scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.
Winners by area
Specifications side by side
A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.
Price and availability
Store links are not paid: prices are copied from each store's own page with the date checked, and Comparezi earns only from labelled ads. How we earn
X300
No current price recorded.
Pros and cons
X300
- Pro: 90 W wired charging, faster than 84 % of the 338 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Dedicated 50 MP telephoto camera
- Pro: 200 MP main camera, higher resolution than 95 % of the 368 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Wireless charging
- Pro: IP68 + IP69 dust and water resistance
17 Ultra
- Pro: 90 W wired charging, faster than 84 % of the 338 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Dedicated 200 MP telephoto camera
- Pro: Wireless charging
- Pro: IP68 + IP69 dust and water resistance
- Con: Heavier than most phones on Comparezi (218.4 g)
- Con: No published update policy
Which should you buy?
X300 if you want the strongest overall specification: it has the higher Comparezi Score (62.1).
17 Ultra if price matters most: it is the cheaper option at ₹1,39,999.
More
Other phones comparisons
Infinix GT 30 5G+ vs NOTE 50s 5G+
- GT 30 5G+
- NOTE 50s 5G+
K14 5G vs Y51 Pro 5G
- K14 5G
- Y51 Pro 5G
X200T vs 17
- X200T
-
17