vivo
Phones · head to head
X300 Pro vs 17 Ultra
Xiaomi
17 Ultra
Quick verdict
- 17 Ultra leads on display.
- X300 Pro leads on battery.
- 17 Ultra leads on build.
- X300 Pro has the higher Comparezi Score (60.9).
Computed from stored specifications, the published phones scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.
Winners by area
Specifications side by side
A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.
Price and availability
Store links are not paid: prices are copied from each store's own page with the date checked, and Comparezi earns only from labelled ads. How we earn
Pros and cons
X300 Pro
- Pro: 90 W wired charging, faster than 84 % of the 338 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Dedicated 200 MP telephoto camera
- Pro: Wireless charging
- Pro: IP68 + IP69 dust and water resistance
- Pro: 7 years of security updates promised
- Con: Heavier than most phones on Comparezi (226 g)
17 Ultra
- Pro: 90 W wired charging, faster than 84 % of the 338 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Dedicated 200 MP telephoto camera
- Pro: Wireless charging
- Pro: IP68 + IP69 dust and water resistance
- Con: Heavier than most phones on Comparezi (218.4 g)
- Con: No published update policy
Which should you buy?
X300 Pro if you want the strongest overall specification: it has the higher Comparezi Score (60.9).
17 Ultra if price matters most: it is the cheaper option at ₹1,39,999.
More
Other phones comparisons
Infinix GT 30 5G+ vs NOTE 50s 5G+
- GT 30 5G+
- NOTE 50s 5G+
K14 5G vs Y51 Pro 5G
- K14 5G
- Y51 Pro 5G
X200T vs 17
- X200T
-
17