Samsung
Phones · head to head
Galaxy S25 Ultra vs X300
vivo
X300
Quick verdict
- X300 is better for battery life.
- X300 is better for light and compact.
- Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on display.
- X300 leads on camera.
- X300 leads on battery.
- X300 has the higher Comparezi Score (62.1).
Computed from stored specifications, the published phones scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.
Winners by area
Specifications side by side
A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.
Price and availability
Store links are not paid: prices are copied from each store's own page with the date checked, and Comparezi earns only from labelled ads. How we earn
X300
No current price recorded.
Pros and cons
Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Pro: Dedicated 50 MP telephoto camera
- Pro: 200 MP main camera, higher resolution than 95 % of the 368 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Wireless charging
- Pro: IP68 dust and water resistance
- Pro: 7 years of security updates promised
- Con: Smaller battery (5,000 mAh) than most phones on Comparezi
- Con: Heavier than most phones on Comparezi (218 g)
X300
- Pro: 90 W wired charging, faster than 84 % of the 338 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Dedicated 50 MP telephoto camera
- Pro: 200 MP main camera, higher resolution than 95 % of the 368 phones on Comparezi with a published figure
- Pro: Wireless charging
- Pro: IP68 + IP69 dust and water resistance
Which should you buy?
X300 if you want the strongest overall specification: it has the higher Comparezi Score (62.1).
Galaxy S25 Ultra if price matters most: it is the cheaper option at ₹1,19,999.
More
Other phones comparisons
Infinix GT 30 5G+ vs NOTE 50s 5G+
- GT 30 5G+
- NOTE 50s 5G+
K14 5G vs Y51 Pro 5G
- K14 5G
- Y51 Pro 5G
X200T vs 17
- X200T
-
17