Skip to content

Water Purifiers · head to head

Classic Nxt RO+MF vs Classic UV+ G2

Save New comparison

Quick verdict

  • Classic UV+ G2 is better for not sure.
  • Classic Nxt RO+MF is better for big tank.
  • Classic Nxt RO+MF leads on purification.
  • Classic Nxt RO+MF leads on capacity.
  • Classic UV+ G2 leads on build and features.

Computed from stored specifications, the published water purifiers scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.

Winners by area

Purification Classic Nxt RO+MF
Capacity Classic Nxt RO+MF
Build and features Classic UV+ G2

Specifications side by side

Spec
Classic Nxt RO+MF
Classic UV+ G2
Purification
Technology
RO+MF, 6-stage
UV, 4-stage (11 W UV lamp)
RO
Yes
No
UV
No
Yes (better)
Purification stages
6 (better)
4
Max input TDS
2,000 ppm (better)
200 ppm
Capacity
Storage
7 litres (better)
6 litres
Purification rate
—
114 L/h
Water recovery
25%
—
Build and features
Power
36 W
26 W (better)
Tank material
—
Food safe, non-toxic, engineering-grade plastics
Model number
WCRA500
WCUV400
Ownership
Filter life
4000 litres (germ-kill cartridge)
6000 litres (germ-kill cartridge)
Warranty
1 year
1 year
Warranty terms
1 Year
1 Year

A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.

Price and availability

Store links are not paid: prices are copied from each store's own page with the date checked, and Comparezi earns only from labelled ads. How we earn

Classic Nxt RO+MF

No price yet

No current price recorded.

Classic UV+ G2

No price yet

No current price recorded.

Pros and cons

Classic Nxt RO+MF

  • Con: Lower water recovery (more water rejected) than 95% of the 21 RO purifiers on Comparezi that state it (25%)

Classic UV+ G2

  • Pro: Purifies 114 litres an hour, faster than 97% of the 40 water purifiers on Comparezi that state it

More

Other water purifiers comparisons

View all →
Compare