Skip to content

Cars · head to head

AMG GLE 53 Coupé vs Cayenne Electric

Save New comparison
Ex-showroom price ₹1.77 crore – ₹2.28 crore ex-showroom

Quick verdict

  • Cayenne Electric is better for performance.

Computed from stored specifications, the published cars scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.

Specifications side by side

Spec
AMG GLE 53 Coupé
Cayenne Electric
Overview
Body type
SUV
SUV
Fuel
Petrol, Mild hybrid
Electric
Petrol
Yes
—
Electric
—
Yes
Engine and performance
Engine displacement
2,999 cc
—
Engines
2999 cc petrol
—
Max power
435.1 PS
1,156 PS
Power (as stated)
Petrol: 320 kW + 15 kW (435 HP + 20 HP) (Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Performance)
Electric motor: Overboost Power with Launch Control up to 325 kW / 442 PS (Cayenne Electric), 850 kW / 1,156 PS (Cayenne Turbo Electric)
Max power converted from kW or hp
Yes
—
Max torque
560 Nm
1,500 Nm
Transmission
9G-TRONIC
—
Battery and range
Battery
—
113 kWh
Battery capacity
—
113 kWh
Charging
—
10-80% in 16 min (max DC 390 kW)
Dimensions and weight
Seating
5 seats
5 seats
Seats
5
5
Length
4,944 mm
4,985 mm
Width
2,018 mm
1,980 mm
Height
1,720 mm
1,674 mm
Wheelbase
—
3,023 mm
Ground clearance
—
190 mm
Boot space
655 litres
781 litres
Fuel tank
85 litres
—
Kerb weight (as stated)
2375 kg
2525 to 2645 kg
Kerb weight
2,375 kg
2,525 kg
Price
Ex-showroom price from
₹1,52,00,000
₹1,77,27,000
Ex-showroom price up to
—
₹2,27,51,000

A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.

Pros and cons

AMG GLE 53 Coupé

  • Pro: Up to 435.1 PS, more powerful than 81% of the 96 SUVs on Comparezi that state it
  • Pro: 655 litres of boot space, more than 81% of the 55 SUVs on Comparezi that state it

Cayenne Electric

  • Pro: Up to 1156 PS, more powerful than 98% of the 96 SUVs on Comparezi that state it
  • Pro: Up to 1500 Nm of torque, more than 98% of the 92 SUVs on Comparezi that state it
  • Pro: 781 litres of boot space, more than 87% of the 55 SUVs on Comparezi that state it
  • Con: Lower ground clearance than 82% of the 29 SUVs on Comparezi that state it (190 mm)
Compare