Skip to content

Bikes and scooters · head to head

Magnus Neo vs QC1

Save New comparison

Ampere

Magnus Neo

Ex-showroom price From ₹90,999 ex-showroom, Delhi

Honda

QC1

Ex-showroom price From ₹90,708 ex-showroom, Delhi

Quick verdict

  • QC1 is better for light and easy to handle.
  • Magnus Neo is better for electric range.

Computed from stored specifications, the published bikes and scooters scoring rules and recorded prices. Not an opinion.

Specifications side by side

Spec
Magnus Neo
QC1
Overview
Type
Electric scooter
Electric scooter
Fuel
Electric
Electric
Electric
Yes
Yes
Variants
—
1
Colours
Mystic Mauve, Matcha Green, Ocean Blue, Butter Yellow
Pearl Serenity Blue, Matt Foggy Silver Metallic, Pearl Igneous Black, Pearl Misty White, Pearl Shallow Blue
Warranty
Vehicle 3 years / 30,000 km; battery 5 years / 75,000 km
3 years / 50,000 km (whichever comes first); battery and charger 3 years / 50,000 km
Engine and performance
Max power
3.3 PS
2.4 PS
Power (as stated)
2.4 kW peak
1.8 kW (Motor Peak Power)
Max power converted from kW or hp
Yes
Yes
Max torque
—
77 Nm
Top speed
60 km/h
50 km/h
Battery and range
Battery
2.3 kWh
1.5 kWh
Battery capacity
2.3 kWh
1.5 kWh
Range
125 km
80 km
Range (as stated)
125 km (IDC); 85 km real
80 km (IDC)
Charging
0-80% 5 h; 0-100% 6 h; off-board 450 W
0-80% in 4 hrs 30 min; 0-100% in 6 hrs 50 min (330 W off-board charger)
Dimensions and weight
Kerb weight
104 kg
89.5 kg
Kerb weight (as stated)
104 kg
89.5 kg
Seat height
777 mm
704 mm
Ground clearance
156 mm
169 mm
Brakes and tyres
Front brake
Drum
Drum 130 mm
Rear brake
Drum
Drum 110 mm
Tyres
12-inch front / 10-inch rear steel wheels
—
Price
Ex-showroom price from
₹90,999
₹90,708
Ex-showroom price city
Delhi
Delhi

A tick marks the better value where the category rules say higher (or lower) is better. Text values are shown without a winner. Ties have no winner.

Pros and cons

Magnus Neo

  • Pro: Kerb weight of 104 kg, lighter than 80% of the 21 electric scooters on Comparezi that state it
  • Con: Drum brake at the front, not a disc

QC1

  • Pro: Up to 77 Nm of torque, more than 82% of the 17 electric scooters on Comparezi that state it
  • Pro: Kerb weight of 89.5 kg, lighter than 90% of the 21 electric scooters on Comparezi that state it
  • Pro: 704 mm seat height, lower than 96% of the 29 electric scooters on Comparezi that state it
  • Pro: 169 mm ground clearance, higher than 76% of the 26 electric scooters on Comparezi that state it
  • Con: Less powerful than 88% of the 42 electric scooters on Comparezi that state it (2.4 PS)
  • Con: Lower top speed than 88% of the 44 electric scooters on Comparezi that state it (50 km/h)
  • Con: Shorter brand-stated range than 93% of the 63 electric two-wheelers on Comparezi that state it (80 km)
  • Con: Drum brake at the front, not a disc
Compare